World

Australia politics live: new rules for cosmetic procedures industry; AMA criticises calls to lower tobacco excise | Australia news


New guidelines for Australia’s cosmetic industry

Natasha May

Natasha May

Australians having cosmetic procedures will have stronger protections from today, with new guidelines for health practitioners coming into effect.

The guidelines, published by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra), target unsafe practices and misleading ads for non-surgical cosmetic procedures such as injections and fillers.

Under the new rules, further training or education will be necessary for many health practitioners wanting to expand the services they provide into these procedures. Many will need more than just the foundational qualifications – nurses, for example, will be required to complete a set period of practice before they are allowed to perform these procedures.

The nursing and midwifery board of Australia chair, adjunct Prof Veronica Casey, said the guidelines are the robust response needed to safeguard consumers in the growing industry.

A lot of people might think of these procedures in the same way they’d consider getting a facial or a haircut. But these are clinical procedures and require appropriate training and experience to be performed safely.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Labor and Liberal frontbenchers agree: public land should be public land

There’s at least one thing that Labor frontbencher Amanda Rishworth and Liberal frontbencher Tim Wilson have in common, and that’s an opposition to a Sydney council’s idea to charge large groups – including schools, dog walkers or personal trainers – to pay to use public parks.

North Sydney council is considering a new fee for groups of 21 people or more at parks that are heavily used by private schools and commercial operators.

On the Today show earlier, Rishworth said “public land should be public land”:

Public land should be public land … from time to time councils might need to manage how that public land is shared. But ultimately public land should be public land.

Wilson said the idea “doesn’t pass the pub test”, but there were exceptions.

Unless you’re using it for a commercial purpose, and then, of course, if you’re part of a small business using it for commercial purpose, then there should be some discussion.

Share

Updated at 



Source link

Comment ×

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *